[ Till Kamppeter ]
* debian/filters/pstopdf: Let pstopdf determine the page size via
the "PageSize" or "PageRegion" setting in the 5th command line
argument and not via "media". The "media" setting is usually
inserted by CUPS and uses a PWG name of the paper size and not the
name used in the PPD file. This makes Ghostscript being called
without paper size setting and so a PDF file in the default paper
size (A4/Letter) is passed on, breaking any printout from applications
which send jobs in PostScript and which have a non-default paper
size (LP: #787635).
[ Martin Pitt ]
* Revert calling "convert" on the banner PNGs (r961); the file is already
correct in the source. The format conversion happens in Ubuntu's
pkgbinarymangler, so it does not affect Debian builds at all and also this
cannot be circumvented that way. Instead, blacklist this package from
pkgstripfiles. (LP: #710881)
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2 (no changes necessary).
-- Martin Pitt <email address hidden> Wed, 25 May 2011 07:03:55 +0200
This bug was fixed in the package cups - 1.4.6-6
---------------
cups (1.4.6-6) unstable; urgency=low
[ Till Kamppeter ] filters/ pstopdf: Let pstopdf determine the page size via
* debian/
the "PageSize" or "PageRegion" setting in the 5th command line
argument and not via "media". The "media" setting is usually
inserted by CUPS and uses a PWG name of the paper size and not the
name used in the PPD file. This makes Ghostscript being called
without paper size setting and so a PDF file in the default paper
size (A4/Letter) is passed on, breaking any printout from applications
which send jobs in PostScript and which have a non-default paper
size (LP: #787635).
[ Martin Pitt ] ngler, so it does not affect Debian builds at all and also this
* Revert calling "convert" on the banner PNGs (r961); the file is already
correct in the source. The format conversion happens in Ubuntu's
pkgbinaryma
cannot be circumvented that way. Instead, blacklist this package from
pkgstripfiles. (LP: #710881)
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2 (no changes necessary).
-- Martin Pitt <email address hidden> Wed, 25 May 2011 07:03:55 +0200