Comment 4 for bug 690040

Kees,

thanks for pointing out. I guess for maverick we won't get around adding these extra calls to the upstart script, but this is really expensive (it starts a big perl process for each of those). For natty, is it planned to move apparmor to an upstart job, so that jobs can just wait for it to be available? Otherwise I'd just go back to using an init.d script; right now, cups starts too early for my taste, and the original reason why we moved to upstart in the first place (starting before samba) turned out to not work anyway.