As far as I know, Xvfb and --headless result in quite different
environments, as the first will run in normal graphical mode and the
latter won't.
I see no reason why this would affect your extension packing, however I
have no experience with extensions in Chromium. Could the graphical
environment be playing a role here?
As far as I know, Xvfb and --headless result in quite different
environments, as the first will run in normal graphical mode and the
latter won't.
I see no reason why this would affect your extension packing, however I
have no experience with extensions in Chromium. Could the graphical
environment be playing a role here?
Did you try the natural
---> "ChrUnsnapped" extension= MyExt --pack- extension- key=MyExt. pem
xvfb-run /snap/bin/chromium --class=
--pack-
<---
instead? The snap won't have access to the system's /tmp, but I think
you can work around that, at least for the sake of testing.