Comment 15 for bug 1765660
Revision history for this message
| Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo (cascardo) wrote | #15 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
Sorry about the lying in the regression potential. It probably referred to a previous backport attempt, that only applied the respective patch. As we discussed a few months ago, kexec/kdump/crash would be backported because of their relationship with the linux package, and its siblings linux-lts, linux-hwe, etc. That doesn't mean we shouldn't or can't test the packages more thoroughly. That's why I introduced ADT support to kdump, and would like to work on more testing for those packages. Right now, I can do more manual testing for this, and add my results to the bug.
Thanks for bringing this up.
Cascardo.