> thanks. That's coming from the C preprocessor (there might be a way
> to improve this by modifying the popen to redirect the standard
> error - will see).
>
> The -q option was probably documented to cover this case:
>
> cproto -q -E0 foo.c
>
> which does the expected thing.
answer from the upstream author:
> thanks. That's coming from the C preprocessor (there might be a way
> to improve this by modifying the popen to redirect the standard
> error - will see).
>
> The -q option was probably documented to cover this case:
>
> cproto -q -E0 foo.c
>
> which does the expected thing.