We added lsb sections to the inits a couple of releases ago (I did it when I was about to apply for MOTU). The Debian maintainer has decided (finally) to add them. From glancing at them, it does not appear to me like there is a difference there that is worth maintaining. Unless you see a clear reason to do so, I think we should drop the Ubuntu lsb inits and use Debian's.
The package was just rebuilt against the new ldap 2.4, so the patch will need to be updated (debian/changelog is all that's impacted.
Please have a look at bug #189554. If there's a real postinst problem it would be good to deal with it in this merge.
Pretty good, but needs a couple of things....
We added lsb sections to the inits a couple of releases ago (I did it when I was about to apply for MOTU). The Debian maintainer has decided (finally) to add them. From glancing at them, it does not appear to me like there is a difference there that is worth maintaining. Unless you see a clear reason to do so, I think we should drop the Ubuntu lsb inits and use Debian's.
The package was just rebuilt against the new ldap 2.4, so the patch will need to be updated (debian/changelog is all that's impacted.
Please have a look at bug #189554. If there's a real postinst problem it would be good to deal with it in this merge.