If it's of any help to know, the output is almost correctly aligned on an English system if you use the human (-h) option of df. (It's only off by one space, starting from the"Size" column).
Perhaps the alignment code for that case could be factored out and used more generally?
If it's of any help to know, the output is almost correctly aligned on an English system if you use the human (-h) option of df. (It's only off by one space, starting from the"Size" column).
Perhaps the alignment code for that case could be factored out and used more generally?
luke
[code] ureadahead/ debugfs
$ df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda6 19G 12G 6.4G 64% /
udev 2.0G 316K 2.0G 1% /dev
none 2.0G 228K 2.0G 1% /dev/shm
none 2.0G 380K 2.0G 1% /var/run
none 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /var/lock
none 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /lib/init/rw
none 19G 12G 6.4G 64% /var/lib/
...
$ df ureadahead/ debugfs
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda6 19228276 11629644 6621884 64% /
udev 2060668 316 2060352 1% /dev
none 2060668 228 2060440 1% /dev/shm
none 2060668 380 2060288 1% /var/run
none 2060668 0 2060668 0% /var/lock
none 2060668 0 2060668 0% /lib/init/rw
none 19228276 11629644 6621884 64% /var/lib/
[/code]