On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Vladimir <email address hidden> wrote:
> Jakob Unterwurzacher
> This is a wrong question. The question should be like this: If there is a
> utility with questionable benefits eating up unnecessary resources and doing
> next to nothing, then why we should keep it there?
>
> If we accept the fact, that "it does not matter" we could quickly find
> ourself literally buried under pile of similar garbage. Linux used to
> be *small and efficient*. Please try keep it that way.
>
>
Vladamir is exactly right. Kruft needs to stay off our systems.
Besides, Microsoft and Macrovision have patents on bloatware, and they would
be pissed if we infringed on their intellectual property.
Happy Trails,
Loye Young archive. iycc.net
Isaac & Young Computer Company
Laredo, Texas
http://
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Vladimir <email address hidden> wrote:
> Jakob Unterwurzacher
> This is a wrong question. The question should be like this: If there is a
> utility with questionable benefits eating up unnecessary resources and doing
> next to nothing, then why we should keep it there?
>
> If we accept the fact, that "it does not matter" we could quickly find
> ourself literally buried under pile of similar garbage. Linux used to
> be *small and efficient*. Please try keep it that way.
>
>