I think that would be a -1 on what Scott said, since he says an MIR *would* be appropriate here :)
(I tend to agree; being developed in-house doesn't mean it's impervious to security concerns.)
I think that would be a -1 on what Scott said, since he says an MIR *would* be appropriate here :)
(I tend to agree; being developed in-house doesn't mean it's impervious to security concerns.)