Comment 9 for bug 1100326
Revision history for this message
|
|
#9 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
e3ace39
(Get the code!)
(In reply to comment #6)
>
> Marking new since support for geoclue is reasonable. However, what do you
> think of dynamically linking to geoclue so that we can build on systems that do
> not have geoclue?
I think it might be a bit early to do that. I don't think that Geoclue's got any guarantees of API stability just yet, and I would expect problems if it were to changes (which could be causing crashes in the front-ends).
For now, I'd just fancy any hints to make it link properly, so that I can rework and test the code as mentioned in comment #2. Then using GModule it should be pretty straight forward to build without geoclue, but the support to still be enabled.