Ubuntu
cgmanager package

  1. Bug #1392176
  2. Comment #35

Comment 35 for bug 1392176

Revision history for this message
Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn) wrote : Re: [Bug 1392176] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

> But I'm a bit worried, doesn't not mounting cpuset mean that containers,
> for instance, wouldn't work so well?

You just won't be able to lock containers to cpusets.

> That is, even if cgmanager doesn't mount the cpuset cgroup, if
> *anything* mounts it, processes in that cgroup tree will experience the
> underlying issue, no?

Yes.

And I still think that systemd is currently mounting it regardless
of cgmanager.

So ideally the effective_cpus thing would be fixed to work for
non-unified hierarchies.