Comment 11 for bug 1822872

# IRC Discussion on freenode (#ubuntu-devel)
[11:46:46] <xnox> slashd, jamespage - what am i missing about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1822872 ? =)
[11:46:47] <ubottu>Launchpad bug 1822872 in ceph (Ubuntu Bionic) "Bionic: Luminous radosgw incompatible with libssl1.1" [Medium,Confirmed]
[11:47:10] <xnox> slashd, jamespage - libssl/libcrypto 1.0 and 1.1 are coinstallable and both are support in bionic, in main from now and until forever.
[11:47:13] <xnox> so what's broken?
[11:48:41] <xnox> slashd, jamespage - sound slike load_dll should be dll opening libcrypto.so.1.0 if that's what it expects?
[11:50:30] <xnox> slashd, jamespage - imho we should builddepend on libssl1.0 and set CIVETWEB_SSL_SSL_LIB and CIVETWEB_SSL_CRYPTO_LIB to versioned sonames of libssl.so.1.0 and libcrypto.so.1.0
[11:52:38] <jamespage> xnox, slashd: tbh I think that's fine
[11:52:57] <jamespage> I'm easy either way - slashd are you ok to SRU that?
[11:53:21] <slashd> jamespage, yeah I can SRU the libssl-dev downgrade to 1.0
[11:53:31] <xnox>jamespage, well reading the code, it sounds slightly harder. cause WITH_RADOSGW tries to build with SSL_INCLUDE_DIR
[11:54:35] <xnox>slashd, if it works. cause it does look that radosgw, rgw, civetweb all need to use libssl1.0-dev then.
[11:55:11] <xnox>slashd, ah, and that's all that does ssl there, so it's fine.
[12:04:48] <xnox> slashd, and we reverted and forced to use libssl1.0-dev with nodejs 8 in bionic
[12:05:01] <xnox> slashd, and one should use libssl-dev (aka 1.1) with nodejs in disco.