It appears that the Focal package has three separate patches for three different issues:
- vala compilation
- showing an 'e' submenu
- undoing xf86 workaround, necessary after an xorg update
and it appears that the Groovy package has these three same fixes but all squashed into one patch. Is this intentional? Normally it's better to keep separate fixes separate, so they can be more easily enabled/removed, or backed out when it's found they're not necessary years later.
It appears that the Focal package has three separate patches for three different issues:
- vala compilation
- showing an 'e' submenu
- undoing xf86 workaround, necessary after an xorg update
and it appears that the Groovy package has these three same fixes but all squashed into one patch. Is this intentional? Normally it's better to keep separate fixes separate, so they can be more easily enabled/removed, or backed out when it's found they're not necessary years later.
Thanks