Comment 22 for bug 194687

Stephan Hermann wrote:
> @William,
>
> na security was correct...the problem is, that it now only runs with a
> path as / and not with paths as /<foobar>/
>
> I mean, I don't care if it goes to -security or if we just push it to
> -updates

The security fix was not correct - it caused a regression. That deserves
to go into -security, particularly as people with -security enabled
won't necessarily have -updates enabled.

--
William Grant