On 8/9/2011 10:57 AM, Scott Moser wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, John A Meinel wrote:
>
>> 3) Because of the ^C and re-push, the branch did not end up stacked
>> on the development focus:
>> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-on-ec2/live-build/cloud-images/.bzr/branch/branch.conf
>>
>>
(there should be a 'stacked_on_location' there.)
>
> There was no control-C . At least, if I reported that there was, I
> am uncertain of that. Instead, the initial push just fails with the
> message above.
>
> So at very least there is a bug there.
>
Your initial push doesn't say anything about failing, just taking a while.
Your symptoms match the case when a bzr meta-directory exists, but the
branch directory does not. (a .bzr/ dir exists, but .bzr/branch/ is
missing.) That can happen if someone starts pushing to a branch and
interrupts it. The *next* push would show the symptoms you describe. (it
would fail to notice that the branch should be stacked, so create a
complete new copy of the history in the target location.)
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 8/9/2011 10:57 AM, Scott Moser wrote: bazaar. launchpad. net/~ubuntu- on-ec2/ live-build/ cloud-images/ .bzr/branch/ branch. conf on_location' there.)
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, John A Meinel wrote:
>
>> 3) Because of the ^C and re-push, the branch did not end up stacked
>> on the development focus:
>> http://
>>
>>
(there should be a 'stacked_
>
> There was no control-C . At least, if I reported that there was, I
> am uncertain of that. Instead, the initial push just fails with the
> message above.
>
> So at very least there is a bug there.
>
Your initial push doesn't say anything about failing, just taking a while.
Your symptoms match the case when a bzr meta-directory exists, but the
branch directory does not. (a .bzr/ dir exists, but .bzr/branch/ is
missing.) That can happen if someone starts pushing to a branch and
interrupts it. The *next* push would show the symptoms you describe. (it
would fail to notice that the branch should be stacked, so create a
complete new copy of the history in the target location.)
John enigmail. mozdev. org/
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAk5 BKzkACgkQJdeBCY SNAAPaMwCgmeyZz 95O+/FFsGswMZbw Vb2/ dfsRUxxFTGspUEW 5N
35cAn3n88lBJfjK
=0BgU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----