On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 03:30 +0000, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I think that makes sense. I've unsubscribed UUS and am marking this
> invalid. For the original reporter, I'd suggest you file a bug in
> Debian if you want to pursue this.
Huh? Since when did we start fixing thing by saying 'go to debian'.
As for
"Is this really correct? Does bzr-svn enhance svn, or is it a transition
tool to migrate to bzr. I'm doubtful of this change and I don't think
it's worth carrying and Ubuntu diff for. I'd suggest that the reporter
should file a bug in Debian with the patch and see if they are willing
to pick it up. Other opinions?"
bzr-svn enhances both bzr and svn - it certainly improves what you can
do with svn as well with bzr.
with respect to the packaging list, thats fine - but this is the
bugtracker for *ubuntu*, so its entirely appropriate for bugs to live
here and be tracked/managed where they can be found.
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 03:30 +0000, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I think that makes sense. I've unsubscribed UUS and am marking this
> invalid. For the original reporter, I'd suggest you file a bug in
> Debian if you want to pursue this.
Huh? Since when did we start fixing thing by saying 'go to debian'.
As for
"Is this really correct? Does bzr-svn enhance svn, or is it a transition
tool to migrate to bzr. I'm doubtful of this change and I don't think
it's worth carrying and Ubuntu diff for. I'd suggest that the reporter
should file a bug in Debian with the patch and see if they are willing
to pick it up. Other opinions?"
bzr-svn enhances both bzr and svn - it certainly improves what you can
do with svn as well with bzr.
with respect to the packaging list, thats fine - but this is the
bugtracker for *ubuntu*, so its entirely appropriate for bugs to live
here and be tracked/managed where they can be found.
status confirmed
-- www.robertcolli ns.net/ keys.txt>.
GPG key available at: <http://