Comment 4 for bug 748340

Revision history for this message
Martin Erik Werner (arand) wrote :

I've spoke to another user who did not seem to have these issues on the current version so it seems it might be something to do with my particular system..

When I run fsck using the debian experimental version of the userspace tools I get this output:

ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo btrfsck /dev/sda5
fs tree 259 refs 7 not found
 unresolved ref root 261 dir 256 index 31 namelen 4 name snap error 600
 unresolved ref root 262 dir 256 index 31 namelen 4 name snap error 600
 unresolved ref root 263 dir 256 index 31 namelen 4 name snap error 600
 unresolved ref root 264 dir 256 index 31 namelen 4 name snap error 600
 unresolved ref root 265 dir 256 index 31 namelen 4 name snap error 600
 unresolved ref root 266 dir 256 index 31 namelen 4 name snap error 600
 unresolved ref root 267 dir 256 index 31 namelen 4 name snap error 600
found 3873710080 bytes used err is 1
total csum bytes: 3517348
total tree bytes: 258281472
total fs tree bytes: 241065984
btree space waste bytes: 70634105
file data blocks allocated: 15013134336
 referenced 4583772160
Btrfs Btrfs v0.19

This is a fairly recent (few days) install, but what I have done so far is taken snapshots of my "/" subvolume via apt-btrfs-snapshot, rolled back to one of these snapshots, and deleted the old "/" subvolume along with some apt-snapshots that I did not use.

So my guess is that btrfs doesnt like that I've removed my original "/" subvolume, which is then what crashes current, and reports the above erros in experimental btrfs-tools.

So updating to the newer version wouldn't make much of a difference in practice, since mountall would still halt on these errors?