On 03/07/2011 10:05 PM, Rom Walton wrote:
> Okay, I think I've found and fixed this issue. The changes should be committed to the 6.10 branch.
>
From what you wrote I understand that this issue is no longer relevant for
the 6.12.x versions, which are already in Debian unstable, right?
I am just somewhat clueless on what we should be doing on the distribution
side. Debian Squeeze just shipped with 6.10.58. Ubuntu Natty is in some late
freeze [1], maybe too late, of the same verion. Please be so kind to reply
again once there is 6.10.59 for us so we do not lose time to confirm the fix
and send out the package.
Dear Rom,
On 03/07/2011 10:05 PM, Rom Walton wrote:
> Okay, I think I've found and fixed this issue. The changes should be committed to the 6.10 branch.
>
From what you wrote I understand that this issue is no longer relevant for
the 6.12.x versions, which are already in Debian unstable, right?
I am just somewhat clueless on what we should be doing on the distribution
side. Debian Squeeze just shipped with 6.10.58. Ubuntu Natty is in some late
freeze [1], maybe too late, of the same verion. Please be so kind to reply
again once there is 6.10.59 for us so we do not lose time to confirm the fix
and send out the package.
Many thanks for your quick reacting to the report
Steffen
[1] https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/NattyReleas eSchedule