On 1/20/08, gQuigs <email address hidden> wrote:
> I ran my tests as the same user so group scheduling should have had
> nothing to do with it.
>
I seem to be missing something. I am not sure how scheduling makes a
difference to your test case, unless you are doing something alongside
it. If your script is sleeping for 10seconds, how much time do you
expect time to return?
> As far as I can tell nice has not been depreciated so it should still
> function as desired.
>
nice behaviour though has changed, it maintains its old behaviour only
within a group.
> Please mark this as valid, again.
> Thank you.
>
On 1/20/08, gQuigs <email address hidden> wrote:
> I ran my tests as the same user so group scheduling should have had
> nothing to do with it.
>
I seem to be missing something. I am not sure how scheduling makes a
difference to your test case, unless you are doing something alongside
it. If your script is sleeping for 10seconds, how much time do you
expect time to return?
> As far as I can tell nice has not been depreciated so it should still
> function as desired.
>
nice behaviour though has changed, it maintains its old behaviour only
within a group.
> Please mark this as valid, again.
> Thank you.
>
Thanks
Dhaval