I am uploading backports for Precise, Oneiric and Lucid to the testing PPA at https://launchpad.net/~pkg-boinc/+archive/testing .
Once I get positive feedback I might upload/copy it to the normal PPA, too.
About getting it fixed in Ubuntu directly, I think it just needs to be rebuilt / re-uploaded. And from doing so in a Precise pbuilder that seems to be the case.
While at it, it could make sense to go with the latest release (6.12~svn1305-1, instead of 5.13+cvs20060510-7ubuntu1) directly.
The Ubuntu delta is:
boinc-app-seti (5.13+cvs20060510-7ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low
* debian/rules: add include directories to fix FTBFS.
* Rebuild gets rid of openssl0.9.8 binary dependency.
Trying to build Debian's version in a Precise pbuilder fails, presumely the include directories are missing. I think the Ubuntu patch might be the following:
Apart from that I wonder what the meaning of boinc-app-seti is - what is the difference from attaching to the SETI project via BOINC itself?
@LocutusOfBorg: The "project" you are referring to is just a code mirror of the pkg-boinc Git branch from Debian (git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-boinc/boinc.git).
I am uploading backports for Precise, Oneiric and Lucid to the testing PPA at https:/ /launchpad. net/~pkg- boinc/+ archive/ testing .
Once I get positive feedback I might upload/copy it to the normal PPA, too.
About getting it fixed in Ubuntu directly, I think it just needs to be rebuilt / re-uploaded. And from doing so in a Precise pbuilder that seems to be the case. 0-7ubuntu1) directly.
While at it, it could make sense to go with the latest release (6.12~svn1305-1, instead of 5.13+cvs2006051
The Ubuntu delta is: 10-7ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low
boinc-app-seti (5.13+cvs200605
* debian/rules: add include directories to fix FTBFS.
* Rebuild gets rid of openssl0.9.8 binary dependency.
-- Ilya Barygin <email address hidden> Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:15:11 +0400
Trying to build Debian's version in a Precise pbuilder fails, presumely the include directories are missing. I think the Ubuntu patch might be the following:
CXXFLAGS += -I/usr/ include/ boinc include/ boinc/lib
CXXFLAGS += -I/usr/
Steffen, why is this not necessary in Debian?
Apart from that I wonder what the meaning of boinc-app-seti is - what is the difference from attaching to the SETI project via BOINC itself?
@LocutusOfBorg: The "project" you are referring to is just a code mirror of the pkg-boinc Git branch from Debian (git:// anonscm. debian. org/pkg- boinc/boinc. git).