> datastore_db.c:1056: DB_ENV->open, err: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery
>
> bogofilter_0.93.3.1-1_i386.deb
> bogofilter_0.93.5-1_i386.deb
>
> I don't think either one should have been in sarge before more testing.
>
> Version:
>
> bogofilter_0.93.1-1_i386.deb
>
> works but also has major bugs filed against it.
>
> IMHO I think this should be rolled back ASAP due to the very soon release of Sarge.
>
> I'm not sure of the exact rules, but I don't see the normal time in unstable before these end up in Sarge.
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:44:33 -0500
From: Clint Adams <email address hidden>
To: Karl Schmidt <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#293207: bogofilter: last two versions caused db errors
> Package: bogofilter
> Version: 0.93.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: unkown
Not much of a justification, is it?
> datastore_ db.c:1056: DB_ENV->open, err: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery 0.93.3. 1-1_i386. deb 0.93.5- 1_i386. deb 0.93.1- 1_i386. deb
>
> bogofilter_
> bogofilter_
>
> I don't think either one should have been in sarge before more testing.
>
> Version:
>
> bogofilter_
>
> works but also has major bugs filed against it.
>
> IMHO I think this should be rolled back ASAP due to the very soon release of Sarge.
>
> I'm not sure of the exact rules, but I don't see the normal time in unstable before these end up in Sarge.
Rolled back to what? Did you read NEWS.Debian?