Comment 54 for bug 284994

Adilson, I completely agree with you. However I think we should provide the upstream developer with the infos he requested (the bug has been closed by the reporter as he doesn't own the mentioned device, but it can be reoppened).

He'll see whether the situation is maintainable in the long term or not. If he can fix his automatic detection algorithm for most/all devices this will show that his choice was good, if he cannot (which I guess is likely to happen), he'll might reconsider his approach. In both cases the end users will have a better situation than now.

On the other hand if we don't provide him with the requested infos, we'll appear as whiners.