Comment 8 for bug 535446

Revision history for this message
Ivan Razumov (iarspider) wrote :

Making changes as described in #3+#4 helps. Although I don't understand why did xax200 took 2nd (index 1) part, and not the 1st (index 0) - taking 1st part seems more logical to me! If you take 1st part, you are safe from a future update that removes the -x-y-smth from the end of version string. But if you take 2nd part, you'd better setup an exception handler (that's what mmbossoni talks about in #7)