Yes. That binutils fix was under this bug: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7011 (no mention of steps to reproduce though) I also raised a bug on binutils myself: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7076 They are probably the same problem.
However, including a RELRO segment should not have any benefit for static executables because they are interpreted by the dynamic linker. See <http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/189> and <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/hardened-toolchain.xml#RELRO>.
Yes. That binutils fix was under this bug: sourceware. org/bugzilla/ show_bug. cgi?id= 7011 sourceware. org/bugzilla/ show_bug. cgi?id= 7076
http://
(no mention of steps to reproduce though)
I also raised a bug on binutils myself:
http://
They are probably the same problem.
However, including a RELRO segment should not have any benefit for static executables because they are interpreted by the dynamic linker. See <http:// www.airs. com/blog/ archives/ 189> and <http:// www.gentoo. org/proj/ en/hardened/ hardened- toolchain. xml#RELRO>.