Comment 11 for bug 612363

Thanks Benjamin, I don't like the naming scheme either - but I'm not
involved with the debian maintenance and kept the same convention that
they are using (and ubuntu has used previously) see [1], lots of
warnings. I think he avoids the original source as to avoid code
duplication in the archive, and just reuses binutils-source, but you
have to keep updating the -avr whenever the source changes. Thanks
for the sponsor.

[1] http://<email address hidden>#binutils-avr

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Launchpad Bug Tracker
<email address hidden> wrote:
> This bug was fixed in the package binutils-avr - 2.20.1-1ubuntu1
>
> ---------------
> binutils-avr (2.20.1-1ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low
>
>  * Includes binutils source code from unstable (2.20.1) (LP: #612363)
>    Fixes FTBFS in maverick due to binutils-source 2.20.51+
>    - removed build-depends: binutils-source
>    - modified debian/rules to use included src/
>    - added copyright info for binutils to debian/copyright
>  -- Scott Howard <email address hidden>   Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:34:51 -0400
>
> ** Changed in: binutils-avr (Ubuntu)
>       Status: New => Fix Released
>
> --
> binutils-avr 2.20-1 FTBFS in maverick (fix and merge with unstable)
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612363
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in “binutils-avr” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> binutils-avr 2.20-3 PTS  BTS  LP        universe        Yes     Failed  Failed  [UNKNOWN] tar (child): /usr/src/binutils/binutils-*.tar.bz2: Cannot open: No such file or directory [1]
>
>
> [1] http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu_ftbfs.cgi
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils-avr/+bug/612363/+subscribe
>