Yes, I think that Debian bug report #483098 gives the background information needed to understand what's going on here.
Bind9 should certainly not by default send its (loopback) address to resolvconf. Bind9 should only send its address to resolvconf if it is known that named can provide general DNS.
Yes, I think that Debian bug report #483098 gives the background information needed to understand what's going on here.
Bind9 should certainly not by default send its (loopback) address to resolvconf. Bind9 should only send its address to resolvconf if it is known that named can provide general DNS.
Seems to me to be rather important.