Message-ID: <20050924102501.GA1708@debian>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:25:01 +0300
From: Anton Zinoviev <email address hidden>
To: Blars Blarson <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#329881: bgoffice: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sh: line 1: 21600 Bus error
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 09:10:38PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Package: bgoffice
> Severity: serious
> Version: 3.0-5
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> bgoffice failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
> pbuilder. It also failed on some other buildds.
In order to build aspell-bg requires more than 1GB RAM+swap. May be
this is what has caused the problem?
I hoped this won't be a problem for autobuilders because in its new
version aspell-bg has changed its architecture from "any" to "all".
If I was wrong I can change aspell-bg to contain a precompiled
dictionary hash in its source package.
Message-ID: <20050924102501 .GA1708@ debian>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:25:01 +0300
From: Anton Zinoviev <email address hidden>
To: Blars Blarson <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#329881: bgoffice: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sh: line 1: 21600 Bus error
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 09:10:38PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Package: bgoffice
> Severity: serious
> Version: 3.0-5
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> bgoffice failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
> pbuilder. It also failed on some other buildds.
In order to build aspell-bg requires more than 1GB RAM+swap. May be
this is what has caused the problem?
I hoped this won't be a problem for autobuilders because in its new
version aspell-bg has changed its architecture from "any" to "all".
If I was wrong I can change aspell-bg to contain a precompiled
dictionary hash in its source package.
Anton Zinoviev