On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 08:27 +0000, leoquant wrote: > bated, > are we talking about the 6.10 version?
Ubuntu 6.10 never had Beryl, so this is doubly invalid.
On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 08:27 +0000, leoquant wrote:
> bated,
> are we talking about the 6.10 version?
Ubuntu 6.10 never had Beryl, so this is doubly invalid.