Comment 4 for bug 348474
Revision history for this message
| Ted Gould (ted) wrote Re: [Bug 348474] Re: Reverting a merge and remerging casuse backtrace | #4 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 15:12 +0000, James Westby wrote:
> If you use plain "bzr revert" without the "." this won't happen.
Wow, thanks for the tip!
I think that first there shouldn't be a stack trace, that's always bad
usability. But two "revert ." should give a message about keeping the
merge record. I didn't realize that there was a difference between the
two types of merge, but now that I know it's a useful distinction.
There should be a way to discover it.