On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 15:12 +0000, James Westby wrote:
> If you use plain "bzr revert" without the "." this won't happen.
Wow, thanks for the tip!
I think that first there shouldn't be a stack trace, that's always bad
usability. But two "revert ." should give a message about keeping the
merge record. I didn't realize that there was a difference between the
two types of merge, but now that I know it's a useful distinction.
There should be a way to discover it.
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 15:12 +0000, James Westby wrote:
> If you use plain "bzr revert" without the "." this won't happen.
Wow, thanks for the tip!
I think that first there shouldn't be a stack trace, that's always bad
usability. But two "revert ." should give a message about keeping the
merge record. I didn't realize that there was a difference between the
two types of merge, but now that I know it's a useful distinction.
There should be a way to discover it.