doesn't see daap services

Bug #450916 reported by Brian J. Murrell on 2009-10-14
38
This bug affects 6 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Banshee
Confirmed
Medium
banshee (Ubuntu)
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: banshee

Using banshee 1.5.1~git2260a87-0ubuntu1 in Karmic, it doesn't seem to see my mt-daapd (Firefly) server. i know the server works, as does mdns on the server because my banshee 1.5.0 on jaunty sees it just fine.

lurgy (dkuester) wrote :

I can confirm on a fresh karmic install. I could see a daap share served by tangerine fine on a banshee 1.5 ppa in jaunty, but no love in karmic.

lurgy (dkuester) wrote :

My bad - I now see the daap share from tangerine, false alarm on my part

Andreas Schildbach (schildbach) wrote :

This bug is still present on Banshee 1.5.3 (installed from the Banshee-Team-PPA) on Karmic.

Fabio Marconi (fabiomarconi) wrote :

Hello

Is this issue present with the latest updated package of karmic or Lucid

thanks
Fabio

Changed in banshee (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Andreas Schildbach (schildbach) wrote :

This bug is still present on Banshee 1.7.2. on Maverick.

Thankfully it is now possible to add a DAAP server manually.

Andreas Schildbach (schildbach) wrote :

Sorry, I meant Banshee 1.7.3 in my previous comment.

Vish (vish) wrote :

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 498697 , so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

Andreas Schildbach (schildbach) wrote :

This is not a duplicate of bug #498697. This bug is about detecting a server, while the other is a about refusing to connect to that server. The workaround (editing smb.conf) does not help either. Please unduplicate.

Andreas Schildbach (schildbach) wrote :

This bug is also still present on Banshee 1.6.1 on Lucid.

Changed in banshee (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → New
Fabio Marconi (fabiomarconi) wrote :

Hello Andreas Schildbach

Can you please run in a teminal

apport-collect -p banshee 450916

Thanks
fabio

tags: added: karmic lucid maverick
tags: added: regression-release
Changed in banshee (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete

Architecture: amd64
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Alpha amd64 (20100630.2)
Package: banshee 1.7.3-2ubuntu2
PackageArchitecture: amd64
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-17.23-generic 2.6.35.2
Tags: maverick
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-17-generic x86_64
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

tags: added: apport-collected

apport information

Changed in banshee (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
Kamus (kamus) wrote :

Brian, have you tried to reproduce this issue with 1.8.0 release included in Maverick?

Changed in banshee (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Medium

On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 22:52 +0000, Kamus wrote:
> Brian, have you tried to reproduce this issue with 1.8.0 release
> included in Maverick?

No. TBH, I dumped banshee quite a while ago and went back to Rhythmbox
due to Banshee's memory greed. I'm not convinced Rhythbox's is terribly
much better, but I doubt it's as bad as Banshee's.

In any case, now with RB crashing every few songs (webkit->libproxy bug)
it never gets a chance to grow overly large. :-/

Micah Gersten (micahg) wrote :

Thank you for your bug report. This bug has been reported to the developers of the software. You can track it and make comments at: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547693
I'm going to mark it as Triaged and wait for upstream to work on this. Thanks for taking the time to make Ubuntu better! Please report any other issues you may find.

Changed in banshee (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Triaged
Changed in banshee:
importance: Unknown → Medium
status: Unknown → Confirmed
KeithG (grider-4) wrote :

Just installed 11.04 AMD 64. I cannot see the forked-daapd server on my local machine (127.0.0.1). If I click on the server name that shows in the left panel, it says "Unable to connect". If I load Rhythmbox, it connects and plays the music which is shared. I am running forked-daapd from debian sid (0.16). It shares this to my other laptop running 10.10 and also to the local machine, but only to Rhythmbox.

If more info is needed, let me know.

Keith

Download full text (23.2 KiB)

I can't confirm or deny this report on Natty since Banshee (or rather, mono) crashes pretty much out of the gate:

[Info 10:03:48.732] Running Banshee 2.0.0: [Ubuntu 11.04 (linux-gnu, i686) @ 2011-06-28 05:46:57 UTC]
[Info 10:03:51.174] Updating web proxy from GConf
[Warn 10:03:51.263] Caught an exception - System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object (in `Banshee.Gio')
  at Banshee.Hardware.Gio.UdevMetadataSource.get_IdMediaDevice () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Banshee.Hardware.Gio.RawBlockDevice.get_IdMediaPlayer () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Banshee.Hardware.Gio.RawDevice..ctor (Banshee.Hardware.Gio.Manager manager, Banshee.Hardware.Gio.GioMetadataSource gioMetadata, Banshee.Hardware.Gio.UdevMetadataSource udevMetadata) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Banshee.Hardware.Gio.RawBlockDevice..ctor (Drive drive, Banshee.Hardware.Gio.Manager manager, Banshee.Hardware.Gio.GioDriveMetadetaSource gioMetadata, Banshee.Hardware.Gio.UdevMetadataSource udevMetadata) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Banshee.Hardware.Gio.RawVolume.get_Parent () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Banshee.Hardware.Gio.BlockDevice.Resolve (IDevice device) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Banshee.Hardware.Gio.HardwareManager.Resolve (IDevice device) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Banshee.Hardware.Gio.Manager+<GetAllDevices>c__Iterator3.MoveNext () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Banshee.Hardware.Gio.HardwareManager+<GetAllBlockDevices>c__Iterator2`1[Banshee.Hardware.ICdromDevice].MoveNext () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Banshee.Hardware.HardwareManager+<CastToCustomDevice>c__IteratorA`1[Banshee.Hardware.ICdromDevice].MoveNext () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Banshee.AudioCd.AudioCdService.Initialize () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Banshee.ServiceStack.ServiceManager.StartExtension (Mono.Addins.TypeExtensionNode node) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
[Warn 10:03:51.263] Extension `Banshee.AudioCd.AudioCdService' not started: Object reference not set to an instance of an object
[Warn 10:03:51.268] Caught an exception - System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object (in `Banshee.Gio')
  at Banshee.Hardware.Gio.UdevMetadataSource.get_IdMediaDevice () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Banshee.Hardware.Gio.RawBlockDevice.get_IdMediaPlayer () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Banshee.Hardware.Gio.RawDevice..ctor (Banshee.Hardware.Gio.Manager manager, Banshee.Hardware.Gio.GioMetadataSource gioMetadata, Banshee.Hardware.Gio.UdevMetadataSource udevMetadata) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Banshee.Hardware.Gio.RawBlockDevice..ctor (Drive drive, Banshee.Hardware.Gio.Manager manager, Banshee.Hardware.Gio.GioDriveMetadetaSource gioMetadata, Banshee.Hardware.Gio.UdevMetadataSource udevMetadata) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Banshee.Hardware.Gio.RawVolume.get_Parent () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Banshee.Hardware.Gio.BlockDevice.Resolve (IDevice device) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Banshee.Hardware.Gio.HardwareManager.Resolve (IDevice device) [0x00000] in <f...

Chow Loong Jin (hyperair) wrote :

On 12/01/2012 23:06, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> I can't confirm or deny this report on Natty since Banshee (or rather,
> mono) crashes pretty much out of the gate:

Looks like the libproxy/webkit bug you mentioned. Is there a bug filed in
Launchpad for this? If not, could you file one please?

Also, I think http://code.google.com/p/libproxy/issues/detail?id=153 is the
relevant upstream bug for that issue.

--
Kind regards,
Loong Jin

On 12-01-12 12:21 PM, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>
> Looks like the libproxy/webkit bug you mentioned.

Shouldn't be per
http://code.google.com/p/libproxy/issues/detail?id=153#c9 (comment #9)
which is the work-around I have implemented here locally and it resolves
the issue with gnome-clock (so as a work-around, it works).

> Is there a bug filed in
> Launchpad for this?

Yup. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libproxy/+bug/547106 and
going on 2 years old now.

> Also, I think http://code.google.com/p/libproxy/issues/detail?id=153 is the
> relevant upstream bug for that issue.

It is, and as you can see in that bug, upstream is not going to address
the very old version of libproxy that Ubuntu is still carrying.

b.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Related questions

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.