Ubuntu

bamfdaemon crashed with SIGSEGV in gdk_display_get_event()

Reported by Jackdaniel1990 on 2011-10-09
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
bamf (Ubuntu)
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

11.10 beta2

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: bamfdaemon 0.2.104-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic i686
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu2
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Oct 9 13:27:18 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/bamf/bamfdaemon
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Beta i386 (20110922)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/bamf/bamfdaemon
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7d0dee: mov 0x8(%esi),%ebp
 PC (0x007d0dee) ok
 source "0x8(%esi)" (0x00000008) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%ebp" ok
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: bamf
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgdk-3.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgdk-3.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgdk-3.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgdk-3.so.0
 gdk_display_get_event () from /usr/lib/libgdk-3.so.0
Title: bamfdaemon crashed with SIGSEGV in gdk_display_get_event()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare
XsessionErrors:
 (nautilus:15364): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_action_set_visible: assertion `GTK_IS_ACTION (action)' failed
 (nautilus:15364): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_action_set_visible: assertion `GTK_IS_ACTION (action)' failed
 (gwibber-service:15709): libindicate-WARNING **: Menu being changed when the indicator is visible. Listeners will NOT be notified of this change.

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #814826, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers