If you're bumping to 9, why not go all the way up to 13? :) Not a blocker either way.
Also, were any changes required? Best Practice is to either say "Update Standards-version to X.Y.Z, no changes needed." or "Update Standards-version to X.Y.Z:" with some bullet points, same with debhelper compat.
Besides these things, I think it looks good, although at some point we might want to question whether this is a package worth keeping in the archive altogether. (Let's treat that as a separate query.)
Thanks for your work! Please re-subscribe ubuntu-sponsors with an updated diff. :)
If you're bumping to 9, why not go all the way up to 13? :) Not a blocker either way.
Also, were any changes required? Best Practice is to either say "Update Standards-version to X.Y.Z, no changes needed." or "Update Standards-version to X.Y.Z:" with some bullet points, same with debhelper compat.
Besides these things, I think it looks good, although at some point we might want to question whether this is a package worth keeping in the archive altogether. (Let's treat that as a separate query.)
Thanks for your work! Please re-subscribe ubuntu-sponsors with an updated diff. :)