Comment 2 for bug 1800040

Actually I guess "mix of Windows & Linux 32 and 64bit" implies that x86 client was tested.

So let me try to clarify:
- server armhf, bacula-fd armhf, bat on remote x86 - works
- server armhf, bacula-fd armhf, bat on same armhf - fails

Is that correct?
If so does it also fail right out of the box with mnimal config?

Also any chance to try to break in on x86 only for more people able to reproduce it.
- server x86, bacula-fd x86, bat on same x86 - ??