The problem exists in backupninja 1.0.1-2 on 16.04 xenial. Because of this duplicity 0.7.06 fails to be recognized as >= 0.6.17, causing it to assume that only the scp/sftp backend is supported and paramiko isn't (06 ! -ge 17) and that it can't handle removing increments older than full backups (06 ! -ge 10).
The fix has been sitting in their git repo since 2014-Feb-22 [0]. The old upstream source location points to this new location. [1]
This isn't the only bug in 1.0.1 that has a fix available but is waiting a 1.0.2 release. There is also a host.rsync bug. [2]
The problem exists in backupninja 1.0.1-2 on 16.04 xenial. Because of this duplicity 0.7.06 fails to be recognized as >= 0.6.17, causing it to assume that only the scp/sftp backend is supported and paramiko isn't (06 ! -ge 17) and that it can't handle removing increments older than full backups (06 ! -ge 10).
The fix has been sitting in their git repo since 2014-Feb-22 [0]. The old upstream source location points to this new location. [1]
This isn't the only bug in 1.0.1 that has a fix available but is waiting a 1.0.2 release. There is also a host.rsync bug. [2]
0) https:/ /0xacab. org/riseuplabs/ backupninja/ commit/ 1017ec315fe2b55 50908abd9f1f4f9 e5edb0bd9d /labs.riseup. net/code/ projects/ backupninja /scriptthe. net/2015/ 02/09/backupnin ja-or-how- i-learned- to-stop- worrying- and-build- from-source/
1) https:/
2) https:/