Comment 87 for bug 68020

I have been absent from this for a while, and in no way helpful in producing the fix, but I must say that I don't think these bugs should all be marked dups. They are different bugs, and should stay as such. My understanding is that the "fix" effectively just drops support for gcj - for some people this is not acceptable (it is for me, though, for now). If support for gcj was ever needed again, for example, these bugs would most definitely be separate, and we've only lost information by conflating them.