Comment 37 for bug 68020

Revision history for this message
Ian Justman (ianj) wrote :

Acutally, bug 78282 seems to be more like it in this case. However, thanks for the clue on that one. The bug you reference pointed to that one as a possible "duplicate" and that one had a solution I could actually use in the meantime. Use the TightVNC server instead.

--Ian.