Comment 7 for bug 264950

Revision history for this message
John Dong (jdong) wrote :

Well the only thing I see fit to do is to lower the number of ports reserved because the chances of having ~1000 users running Azureus is pretty unlikely.

Right now, the choice is either between this or having an arbitrary local user privilege escalation vulnerability, and frankly if the latter were to be the case I would petition to remove Azureus from the archives.