Yes Bug 1288529 is an evolved version of my 1) and I like it.
The extensibility is good as well and once implemented we could discuss what would be a reasonable --teardown when running on autopkgtest infrastructure.
I agree that collecting huge logs has to be default off, but would be great if configurable.
--teardown would provide that.
Maybe once done another parameter to the retest URL, &teardown="you-command"
Yes Bug 1288529 is an evolved version of my 1) and I like it.
The extensibility is good as well and once implemented we could discuss what would be a reasonable --teardown when running on autopkgtest infrastructure.
I agree that collecting huge logs has to be default off, but would be great if configurable.
--teardown would provide that.
Maybe once done another parameter to the retest URL, &teardown= "you-command"
Closing mine and subscribing to the dup!