Comment 20 for bug 1948748

Revision history for this message
Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) wrote :

Thanks Seth,
these tpm things are rather new so exposure to testing is low in general.
You are right, but I think we do not only need what you spotted.

In fact while reading this I found that upstream (Thanks Stefan) maintains great stable branches.
I think we should consider taking in
- https://github.com/stefanberger/libtpms/releases/tag/v0.9.1
- https://github.com/stefanberger/libtpms/releases/tag/v0.9.2
- https://github.com/stefanberger/libtpms/releases/tag/v0.9.3
- plus the patch you've found
- a ppc64 build fix from debian / upstream #297

I'll try to prepare this so that someone else review and ack (or disagree). None of this needs a FFe IMHO all just fixes - we'll want to hold back the actual upload until beta-freeze is over, but that does not prevent to prepare the fixes.

In addition to reduce delta one day I filed:
- https://github.com/stefanberger/libtpms/pull/305

I have prepared that in:
PPA: https://launchpad.net/~paelzer/+archive/ubuntu/libtpms-jammy-0.9.3
MR: https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/libtpms/+git/libtpms/+merge/417854

P.S. this will also resolve the fact that it is - so far - missing on ppc64

Please anyone review and/or consume it from that PPA and let me know if you are +1 on an upload of that.