Comment 18 for bug 2048781

We agreed during the MIR meeting that a generic tooling as part of debhelper would be the best way, didn’t we?

See my arguments above different upstream policies in different source packages, where if we start introducing this in a per-package base, that would create divergences between projects. Does it make sense to have this centrally managed (by our Rust toolchain expert, ideally?).

That way, we can go beyond trimming the windows crates, like tree shaking and so on?