Ralph,
Wow, it's nice to know that people are still hacking away at
this problem. Below are my results from your test. Good
luck!
mhjohnson@matt-desktop:~$ echo touch /tmp/created_by_at | at
now
warning: commands will be executed using /bin/sh
job 27 at Mon Aug 13 21:06:00 2007
mhjohnson@matt-desktop:~$ ls -l /tmp/created_by_at
-rw-r--r-- 1 mhjohnson mhjohnson 0 2007-08-13
21:06 /tmp/created_by_at
mhjohnson@matt-desktop:~$
On Monday August 13 2007 6:50:29 am Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Here's a simple test. Can you try it please. at(1) is
> working for some of us so we need to find out why your
> experience differs.
>
> $ echo touch /tmp/created_by_at | at now
> warning: commands will be executed using /bin/sh
> job 3787 at 2007-08-13 11:45
> $ ls -l /tmp/created_by_at
> -rw-r--r-- 1 ralph ralph 0 2007-08-13 11:45
> /tmp/created_by_at $
Ralph, matt-desktop: ~$ echo touch /tmp/created_by_at | at matt-desktop: ~$ ls -l /tmp/created_by_at matt-desktop: ~$
Wow, it's nice to know that people are still hacking away at
this problem. Below are my results from your test. Good
luck!
mhjohnson@
now
warning: commands will be executed using /bin/sh
job 27 at Mon Aug 13 21:06:00 2007
mhjohnson@
-rw-r--r-- 1 mhjohnson mhjohnson 0 2007-08-13
21:06 /tmp/created_by_at
mhjohnson@
On Monday August 13 2007 6:50:29 am Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Here's a simple test. Can you try it please. at(1) is
> working for some of us so we need to find out why your
> experience differs.
>
> $ echo touch /tmp/created_by_at | at now
> warning: commands will be executed using /bin/sh
> job 3787 at 2007-08-13 11:45
> $ ls -l /tmp/created_by_at
> -rw-r--r-- 1 ralph ralph 0 2007-08-13 11:45
> /tmp/created_by_at $