> Does anyone give a rat's ass about this? I'm guessing not,
> but some kind of notification about it would have been nice.
I am sorry but this kind of attitude doesn't help.
Anyway, I took a look at this and when installing this package in Debian or Ubuntu, I see:
Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/asterisk.service → /lib/systemd/system/asterisk.service
This service file comes from "contrib/systemd/asterisk.service" file, which is the part of upstream source. Interestingly, there's also a Debian patch named "debian/patches/systemd.patch" which adds a new file, "contrib/asterisk.service", which is where the default service file is created from.
So ideally, we should forward this to Debian and have this discussed and brownie points for taking this upstream.
> Does anyone give a rat's ass about this? I'm guessing not,
> but some kind of notification about it would have been nice.
I am sorry but this kind of attitude doesn't help.
Anyway, I took a look at this and when installing this package in Debian or Ubuntu, I see: system/ multi-user. target. wants/asterisk. service → /lib/systemd/ system/ asterisk. service
Created symlink /etc/systemd/
This service file comes from "contrib/ systemd/ asterisk. service" file, which is the part of upstream source. Interestingly, there's also a Debian patch named "debian/ patches/ systemd. patch" which adds a new file, "contrib/ asterisk. service" , which is where the default service file is created from.
So ideally, we should forward this to Debian and have this discussed and brownie points for taking this upstream.