Er... should keximdb be removed from the archive now? I have a feeling that code got moved into KOffice itself in the KOffice 2 series.
Would save rebuilding it if it can just go...
Martin
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:55 PM, fabrice_sp <email address hidden> wrote: > ** Changed in: kdbg (Ubuntu) > Status: New => In Progress > > ** Changed in: kdbg (Ubuntu) > Assignee: (unassigned) => fabrice_sp (fabricesp) > > ** Changed in: keximdb (Ubuntu) > Status: New => In Progress > > ** Changed in: keximdb (Ubuntu) > Assignee: (unassigned) => fabrice_sp (fabricesp) > > -- > Remove aRts from the archive - rebuild all dependencies > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/320915 > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to koffice > in ubuntu. >
Er... should keximdb be removed from the archive now?
I have a feeling that code got moved into KOffice itself
in the KOffice 2 series.
Would save rebuilding it if it can just go...
Martin
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:55 PM, fabrice_sp <email address hidden> wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 320915
> ** Changed in: kdbg (Ubuntu)
> Status: New => In Progress
>
> ** Changed in: kdbg (Ubuntu)
> Assignee: (unassigned) => fabrice_sp (fabricesp)
>
> ** Changed in: keximdb (Ubuntu)
> Status: New => In Progress
>
> ** Changed in: keximdb (Ubuntu)
> Assignee: (unassigned) => fabrice_sp (fabricesp)
>
> --
> Remove aRts from the archive - rebuild all dependencies
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to koffice
> in ubuntu.
>