Thanks but I don't quite understand what you're trying to say.
There are two interpretations of what you said:
1) Did you misread my report and thought I was complaining that one machine does not see a security update yet while the other sees it? That is NOT the case. They both see the same package update, that is an update which claims to be the *same version number*. But on one machine the version is marked as *security*, and on the other it is NOT marked as security.
2) Or are are you telling me that updates which *are* security updates are *normal* to be NOT marked as security updates for some people? That is very very bad. If something is a security update, it needs to be marked as such, otherwise people won't install it quickly!
Thanks but I don't quite understand what you're trying to say.
There are two interpretations of what you said:
1) Did you misread my report and thought I was complaining that one machine does not see a security update yet while the other sees it? That is NOT the case. They both see the same package update, that is an update which claims to be the *same version number*. But on one machine the version is marked as *security*, and on the other it is NOT marked as security.
2) Or are are you telling me that updates which *are* security updates are *normal* to be NOT marked as security updates for some people? That is very very bad. If something is a security update, it needs to be marked as such, otherwise people won't install it quickly!