I don't know what to say, but check out this message:
W: Couldn't stat source package list http://people.ubuntu.com ./ Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/people.ubuntu.com_%7emvo_apt_apt-cache-control_._Packages) -
stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
This is particularly bad on my system, which has about 5 people.ubuntu.com
entries -- it's unobvious which is to blame until I look at %7evmo.
I don't think the actual filenames are very useful, but the full directory used
in the apt sources list should be preserved, as it's the only way I can track
probles back to their source. So for the example I posted, I'd expect:
I don't know what to say, but check out this message:
W: Couldn't stat source package list http:// people. ubuntu. com ./ Packages apt/lists/ people. ubuntu. com_%7emvo_ apt_apt- cache-control_ ._Packages) -
(/var/lib/
stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
This is particularly bad on my system, which has about 5 people.ubuntu.com
entries -- it's unobvious which is to blame until I look at %7evmo.
I don't think the actual filenames are very useful, but the full directory used
in the apt sources list should be preserved, as it's the only way I can track
probles back to their source. So for the example I posted, I'd expect:
deb http:// people. ubuntu. com/~daf/ packages ./
to generate
Hit http:// people. ubuntu. com/~daf/ packages ./ Release
[...]
and
deb http:// bazaar. canonical. com/packages/ debs/ ./
to get me
Hit http:// bazaar. canonical. com/packages/ debs ./ Release
In these specific cases the lines would not be longer than 70 chars, and I think
that may hold true for most repositories.