Comment 1 for bug 1425662
Revision history for this message
| Removed by request (removed3425744) wrote | #1 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
After another test it seems that "apt-get download" doesn't use an advantage from the caches (partial and non-partial) as this example shows:
root@ubuntu:~/tmp# apt-get install adwaita-
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 8861 kB of archives.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://
55% [1 adwaita-
root@ubuntu:~/tmp# apt-get download adwaita-
Get:1 http://
2% [1 adwaita-
root@ubuntu:~/tmp# apt-get install adwaita-
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 8861 kB of archives.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://
Fetched 3376 kB in 3s (1029 kB/s)
debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed
(Reading database ... 92319 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../adwaita-
Unpacking adwaita-
root@ubuntu:~/tmp# apt-get download adwaita-
Get:1 http://
7% [1 adwaita-
I'm wondering why "apt-get download" does then depend on the cache. Or maybe "apt-get download" could be enhanced to use advantages of the caches and fallback to use no cache if something went wrong.