On 28 November 2013 18:43, Michael Vogt <email address hidden> wrote:
> Right, I'm sorry for the trouble and I agree that it would have been
> better to put the erroring into 0.10.0 instead of 0.9.13.
>
> I will add "-f" back so that sbuild is unbroken. Note that it has no
> effect on "buil-dep" (it does on "source").
On 28 November 2013 18:43, Michael Vogt <email address hidden> wrote:
> Right, I'm sorry for the trouble and I agree that it would have been
> better to put the erroring into 0.10.0 instead of 0.9.13.
>
> I will add "-f" back so that sbuild is unbroken. Note that it has no
> effect on "buil-dep" (it does on "source").
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Dmitrijs.