* 2010/5/12 aexl wrote: > > i dont understand the aim of the discussion.
I and lavinog were discussing whether is there a bug in ionice parameter's parsing :)
> when i do a patch then i dont rely on undocumented behaviour - > it might change anytime.
aexl, that's OK :) and thank you for you contribution.
What is interesting for me -- whether such parsing of option's parameter isn't really undocumented? That's not a criticism -- just pure curiousity :)
S.
* 2010/5/12 aexl wrote:
>
> i dont understand the aim of the discussion.
I and lavinog were discussing whether is there a bug in ionice
parameter's parsing :)
> when i do a patch then i dont rely on undocumented behaviour -
> it might change anytime.
aexl, that's OK :) and thank you for you contribution.
What is interesting for me -- whether such parsing of option's
parameter isn't really undocumented? That's not a criticism -- just
pure curiousity :)
S.