The ones I had checked seem to be mirrors of archive.canonical.com. I take it archive.ubuntu.com is supposed to be authoritative.
Should apt-file be somehow responsible for picking a fallback server if the one in /etc/apt/sources.list does not carry Contents-<arch>.gz, or should all mirrors be required to also mirror the Contents files?
@ubuntu-mirror-admins: any opinion on this?
See also bug #179899! (Should ubuntu-mirror-admins be subscribed to that one as well?)
The ones I had checked seem to be mirrors of archive. canonical. com. I take it archive.ubuntu.com is supposed to be authoritative.
Should apt-file be somehow responsible for picking a fallback server if the one in /etc/apt/ sources. list does not carry Contents-<arch>.gz, or should all mirrors be required to also mirror the Contents files?
@ubuntu- mirror- admins: any opinion on this?
See also bug #179899! (Should ubuntu- mirror- admins be subscribed to that one as well?)