I think this output parsing bug bit me again today:
SegvAnalysis: Skipped: missing required field "Disassembly" SourcePackage: gdm Stacktrace: => 0x417010: mov 0x8(%r15),%rcx 0x417014: test %rcx,%rcx 0x417017: je 0x41709f 0x41701d: mov (%rcx),%rbx 0x417020: mov 0x8(%rcx),%r15 0x417024: mov %rbx,%rdi 0x417027: callq 0x414380 0x41702c: cmp %rax,%rbp 0x41702f: jne 0x417010 0x417031: test %rbx,%rbx 0x417034: je 0x41709f 0x417036: test %r14,%r14 0x417039: je 0x41705c 0x41703b: mov $0x50,%esi 0x417040: mov %rbx,%rdi 0x417043: callq 0x40a6c0 <g_type_check_instance_cast@plt> StacktraceTop:
This looks like a misalignment of the fields to me.
I think this output parsing bug bit me again today:
SegvAnalysis: Skipped: missing required field "Disassembly" check_instance_ cast@plt>
SourcePackage: gdm
Stacktrace:
=> 0x417010: mov 0x8(%r15),%rcx
0x417014: test %rcx,%rcx
0x417017: je 0x41709f
0x41701d: mov (%rcx),%rbx
0x417020: mov 0x8(%rcx),%r15
0x417024: mov %rbx,%rdi
0x417027: callq 0x414380
0x41702c: cmp %rax,%rbp
0x41702f: jne 0x417010
0x417031: test %rbx,%rbx
0x417034: je 0x41709f
0x417036: test %r14,%r14
0x417039: je 0x41705c
0x41703b: mov $0x50,%esi
0x417040: mov %rbx,%rdi
0x417043: callq 0x40a6c0 <g_type_
StacktraceTop:
This looks like a misalignment of the fields to me.